Wednesday, 20 April 2016

Mathers Carrie Physics man and Katie.

This is part of a thread I am currently on with a couple more mentally lacking Atheists.


idiot: This student is bored out of his mind listening to the dull lecture that is being presented. Isolated on whtie background with room for your text.idiot: Funny business woman hot itself with a boxing glove and making a face isolated on white background Stock Photo

Earlier in the thread I had posted a comment that demonstrated the fact that the name RICHARD DAWKINS is an anagram of  RASH DARWIN DICK.

They totally missed the point and I was accused of being abusive when in reality I was simply showing them an indisputable FACT.!


Katie Schmid In all seriousness, have you considered that you might have schizophrenia?
LikeReply221 hrs
Ross Kelly In even greater seriousness have you ever considered that you might be incredibly stupid?
LikeReply21 hrs
Physics Man Ross Kelly, do you actually believe that anagrams have predictive powers? If so, why?
LikeReply18 hrs
Physics Man By the way Ross Kelly, don't call Katie Schmid andChad Sparkes stupid because they don't buy your prophetic bullshit when you haven't proven it.
LikeReply118 hrs
Ross Kelly Here's a hint to you from Anna , it's a perfect anagram of the code on my profile picture that I was led to by her in 2002, she already had you in the frame.

NB. SEE ROT ID ROT - PHYSICS MAN AND KATIE...LOL.

Physics Man is the 'name' in my code that isolates the name Katie while also pointing out the quality of your misguided ROTTEN anti God thinking ..LOL.

LikeReply22 mins
Ross Kelly This is a part of a reply thread I was on yesterday and the day before, It's under a post by Dave Mathers, he and Carrie are the only two people other than myself on that thread. Carrie is referring to the synchronicity wins blog when she says she'll check it out.

Yesterday at 01:43
Ross Kelly
Ross Kelly There's more than one way to be shown the same light.
Like · Reply · 1 · Yesterday at 02:19
Carrie Love
Carrie Love Well, I'm the girl to talk too when it comes to synchrnicity ๐Ÿ˜‰
Like · Reply · Yesterday at 02:54
Carrie Love
Carrie Love Awesome Ross, I'll definitely check it out!
Unlike · Reply · 1 · Yesterday at 02:54
Ross Kelly
Ross Kelly I'm off to bed.

xx.
Like · Reply · Yesterday at 02:59
Ross Kelly
Ross Kelly This is the same anagram code that is demonstrated in the What are the odds blog post, the one on my profile picture.

Yesterday was the 18th, that's when the link to Carrie started, this morning I looked at the code and found ...

PLAN TIMES LINK TO CARRIE BY... ON 18.4.16 DATE.

What are the odds?
Like · Reply · 22 hrs
Ross Kelly
Ross Kelly ..

CARRIE'S PLANNED TO LINK A TIME BY, 18.4.2016.

Meaning that your name was planned because it is the one that links yesterday's date in the little code.

18.4.2016'S A PLANNED TIME TO LINK  CARRIE BY.
Like · Reply · 22 hrs
Ross Kelly
Ross Kelly And today?

19.4.2016..PLANNED TO LINK MATHERS BY, I CARE.
Like · Reply · 22 hrs
Ross Kelly
Ross Kelly ..

I PLANNED MATHERS' CARE TO LINK 19.4.2015 BY
Like · Reply · 22 hrs
Ross Kelly
Ross Kelly The code's symbol is O.

I PLANNED 19.4.16 O LINK TO TRACE MATHERS BY.

The letters isolated in the date as their numerical equivalent are the ones that link to Dave just as yesterdays letters isolated the links to Carrie.
Like · Reply · 22 hrs
Ross Kelly
Ross Kelly Anna is the I in those two lines, she created the code (and everything else), Carrie.
Like · Reply · 22 hrs
Ross Kelly
Ross Kelly The code is the ...

PLAN I CREATED TO LINK MATHERS BY ON 19.4.16.
Like · Reply · 22 hrs
Ross Kelly
Ross Kelly ..

NB. 19.4.2016 CODE. I ANNA TIP MATHERS - R.KELLY.

NB.I ANNA TIP R.KELLY - 19.4.2016 - MATHERS CODE.

NB.THE 19.4.2016 O TIPS DM - ANNA, CARRIE, KELLY.
Like · Reply · 20 hrs · Edited
Ross Kelly
Ross Kelly What are the odds?

LikeReply10 mins
Ross Kelly .Today's pretimed subject in the 2002 code.

RE 20.4.16 - ROTTEN ILL PHYSICS MAN AND KATIE.


Link to previous post, Hot pots 2 - http://synchronicitywins.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/hot-pots-2.html

Saturday, 9 April 2016

Hot pots 2.

A continuation of the older Hot pots post which can be seen here -.http://synchronicitywins.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/hot-pots.html





April 2016.

The final solution.

New pot heaters, cooker and wick configuration..




The glass dome is a 24 cm Pyrex mixing bowl and it gets far hotter and much faster than Terra cotta.

The bell on the top of the first one is the handle, I have insulated the top part of it as it gets VERY hot.

It is used to safely remove the bowl .



Heater with knob handle.


 




Wicks with rings.

The wick in the tin showing wick spout, weight, tiny air vent and the wick protector ring.
.

Holds a month's worth of wick (or maybe even two or three) and burns like a dream with no smell thanks to the rings.

They keep fresh unburnt wick feeding the flame and when eventually they need perked up a bit (and I mean EVENTUALLY compared to how it used to be), you just cut off the burnt end, remove the ring and pull the wick up a bit by the fresh wick under the ring, put the ring back on and relight.

They burn very constantly for hours and hours and if you blow them out at night you can more often than not just relight them without adjustment in the morning.

You don't even have to remove them from the heater or take off the Pyrex bowl to adjust the wicks, you just need a pair of longish scissors to cut off the wick top (being careful not to drop it in the oil, blunt the first half inch of the scissor blades for better grip when using them to also take off and put  the ring back on (after the wick adjustment) and a cutlery fork to hold the tin down while pulling a little bit of wick up (I use one with the two central prongs removed) the gap between the oil reservoir and the bowl rim enables this to be done with ease and no oily fingers..
There can sometimes be a little build up of oil residue appearing on the top of a ring, it is very easily cleaned off if necessary.

The washer acts as a weight to prevent the wick tins from floating a bit when first put in the oil reservoir dry.


These wicks burn splendidly for many hours without requiring attention and they do not make any soot while burning as long as the wick is not too long.



The wick holders are perforated at the bottom and have a tiny air hole on the top of the side to allow them to fill quickly.

You can make the same thing out of a wine bottle top and a washer for a base crimped inside the cap with two little bits of the rim of the cap to hold the wick in.


Seven of them sit neatly in the 11 cm flower pot saucer, one in the center and a ring of six as seen in the knob handled pot photo above.

The hole in the saucer is to allow the oil in from the bigger saucer that it sits in.

They are easily refillable with new wick when the time comes and will last indefinitely.


The flower pot saucers are treated with a water based matt finish sealant that prevents them from getting dirty, it gives them a silken appearance , keeps the natural colour and prevents oil soak up which can get very messy otherwise.

You can use water based clear enamel paint if you want a glazed finish.

                                        The wick tins burning in the Pyrex and Terracotta  pot (see below).

Since this photo was taken on May 31 I have changed the little kitten bowl that the wicks are in and now use a similar size stainless steel bowl with a perforated base, this allows me to increase the size of the oil reservoir to the bigger flower pot saucer that the kitten bowl sat in, it now holds eight wicks,not all of which need to be lit at one time to keep the Pyrex hot..

                                     




   

                                             
The golden bell reflection in the pot not caused by the brass bell on the top, it's like a floating hologram...


Copper wire golden shine later in the day.

                                           This picture doesn't do it justice, it looks lovely.


'Everlasting Tealight.


In this picture and the cooker one below the oil reservoir bowl is bigger and higher up, you can still alter the wicks in situe through the gap even though it is smaller but the larger gap with a lower placed saucer allows you to easily remove a wick tin if necessary by picking it up by the clean wick under the ring with your scissors..


The cooker.

                                   Pork joint being cooked to perfection in the Pyrex Tagine.

Chilli.




This excellent cooker cooks anything from curries to roast meat joints, it's like having a glass Tagine in the middle of your table, it gently simmers your curry or Chilli or whatever and will even cook the rice in another casserole dish on top of the main one.

The casserole dishes can be used the other way up to be more like a Tagine or you can use the main mixing bowl heater dome as the lid..

19 April 2016.
Three days ago I made a tealight holder stand by fixing a little glass dish to the top of a little Edradour whisky bottle that had been brought to the house by a visitor a couple of days before.

Then I did an experiment to see if I could improve the performance of the wick I use and found that it was immensely successful, I lit it in the holder at 8 PM on Sunday, it is now 8 AM on Tuesday and it is still burning really well.

I have done nothing except add a few oil top ups to the little dish.

After taking the photo of it below I felt prompted to take a look at the FB Edradour  community page .....

Note added April 20 at 2 PM, it's still burning but dwindling fast now, that's 66 hrs

It's time for me to spend a few seconds pulling up the wick a bit and she'll be as good as new..




....... and this was at the top of it -
















There is more than one way to see that God's light shows us everything.














While on the subject of synchronicity here's a thing!

I now use a 12cm ring in place of the stainless bowl, as was the case with the kitten dish (see photo ) it holds 7 wick tins.

I did that to enable more oil to be put in the saucer and it looks neat too.


The bell handle on top of the glass dome is now securely connected to it by some rather amazing heat proof adhesive.

That bell was given to me by a friend who found it in a second hand shop and as soon as I was given it I put it on the top of the flower pot heater that I was using at the time as can be seen in this photo -


I had not yet been given the idea of putting long wicks in tins at that time but Anna certainly knew that she was going to have me do it, this is a perfect anagram of the code that she led me to in 2002 that I found today April 20.


7 WICK TINS AND A BELL ON TOP ID ROSS' HEATER.

Food for thought!






Edradour community page -

https://www.facebook.com/EdradourWhisky/?fref=nf

My Email address - rosskelly52@yahoo.co.uk


Friday, 25 March 2016

Dick by name and Dick by nature...LOL.




What sort of a man is so foolish that he promotes the IDEA that there is no God in an attempt to convince the world that there is no God when clearly he doesn't know whether he is misleading people or not?

It's not a trifling matter is it

Image

The first two pictures below are anagrams of Anna's O code.

(Anna is God.)
The third one, quite rightly, says LOL.



rash1
raสƒ/Submit
adjective
acting or done without careful consideration of the possible consequences; impetuous.
"it would be extremely rash to make such an assumption"
synonyms: reckless, impetuous, impulsive, hasty, overhasty, foolhardy, incautious.

dick - Dictionary Definition : Vocabulary.com


https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/dick

Dick is a vulgar slang word for a penis. It's also an insulting thing to call someone you don't like, especially a boy or man. Much like ass, this word for a below-the-belt body part is very commonly used as an insult meaning pretty much "jerk" or "idiot."

It is also the short form of Richard.

Yes! RASH DARWIN DICK is a perfect anagram of RICHARD DAWKINS..and he believes there is no God behind THE WORD.


Note. It is very difficult to find another anagram of that man's name that makes any sense about any subject, YET IT CONTAINS THAT ONE.







.
Link to previous post, One Direction - 

http://synchronicitywins.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/one-direction.html

Link to more Dawkins code proofs -

http://synchronicitywins.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/atheist-ally-robert-pins-code-on-dawkins.html

Saturday, 19 March 2016

One direction.


Here's a thought.
Science says light travels in straight lines and sure enough which ever way you look it must be coming directly towards you from your focal point.
When you look one way in a room it does that, when you look any other way in a room it does that, when you spin round in a room it does that.
They say light is made up of photon particles that carry the visible message, so why are they not colliding and flying all over the place?
Could it be that the light only ever comes from the direction in which you are looking?
And while I'm on the subject, how does the photon deliver the information to your brain if everything is physical, in what form does that information exist, ?
and once it has where do the particulate photons then go?
Do they pass right through you or do they cease to exist after entering your eye and illuminating your mind with sight?
If they pass through your mind as visible light do those photons then carry information that is YOU?
Like an instant swap?
Or is there no swap, nothing for the light to swap to and no need to swap because the information in the light IS you?
The information in light is not in the form of visibility until it is seen Unless of course there was never a time that it wasn't BEING SEEN.
Or is the information a form of code that carries the message of THE LIGHT?
Certainly light and code are totally compatible if not the same thing.
People now know how to use light instead of WiFi, and the information in Wi Fi is all computer code. 1's and zeros., but look what THAT can show us, it's showing you these words right now in the LIGHT...or ARE you the words?
Maybe there is no light, just the coded information that there IS?
How to make light from no light when you are the absolute mind and absolute coder.
The real divine mind essence behind the light.
Perhaps the answer is at the start of this post.
LikeShow More Reactions
Comment
Comments
Ross Kelly Just added a bit more to it Sharyn Klease
LikeReply116 March at 21:03
Nicholas Tomlin How about we swim in a sea of light at all times, the "instantaneous" speed is actually a pressure wave which moves the light into our eyes, so we see the local light first, not the light that floods out of a globe. Either way it is energy - which fires the photo-chemical receptors in our retinas, generating an electrical impulse which then travels to our brain, hence sight.
Paul David Radford-Hancock look up the word: "Refrangible"
Ross Kelly ..

I TELL R.K A SECRET BY PHOTONS - O ID'S ANA MIND.

All information exists in her light.

O is the symbol for Ana's code.

LikeReply1Yesterday at 18:06
Ross Kelly ..

I TELL R.K A SECRET BY O - PHOTONS ID ANA'S MIND.

Everything we see in her REAL light is an expression of her all knowing mind.

LikeReply1Yesterday at 18:16Edited
Ross Kelly ..

A SECRET I TELL R.K BY O ID'S PHOTONS - ANA MIND.

LikeReply1Yesterday at 18:55
Ross Kelly God is light.
LikeReply2Yesterday at 19:04
Lee Massey Preach Brother Kelly preach...



I posted this to see what other people thought and what I saw is that most other people don't think at all. they just repeat Parrot fashion the things that scientist idiots taught them to think that THEY think.

The real truth about light is that we all reside in it, everything  that we ever received as information of any kind was supplied by it and all for a reason that the world is slowly waking up to,

If you get it you just participated in that speeding up.


Once again a lamb on a table mat was inadvertently captured in the picture, this time by Ben.

You can only see one eye as further purposefully illustrated along with the next amazing photo.






See 'What are the odds' blog post for the first instance of this.
http://synchronicitywins.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/what-are-odds.html

And very corny humour it is.













This photo was taken on the 19th.

Anna's single eye in the sky.

It really is too!








Well, whadda ya know! It's the date that I started this blog post.


Here the code verifies the fact that Anna (Ana) had the photo taken to be used in this blog post.

(There is one blank space O in the line (TO).
Zero is represented by either O or a blank space in Ana's code, therefore O also = a blank space.


NB.3.19 SOLAR PHOTO LINK TIMED TO ID ANA'S EYE.

The photo was taken in Saskatchewan -

NB.3.19 O PR I TOLD IS TO ID EYE IN SASKATCHEWAN.


Why 
SASKATCHEWAN?
2 Reasons -

SASKATCHEWAN = 1. ANA.  2 WATCHES.


(The No's 1 and 2 are S and K)


NB. I TOLD R.K TO ID 3.19 EYE O PINS - ANA WATCHES.







I met Ana during several solar connection experiences in 1996.

Anna is the real thing, she really is the LIGHT OF THE WORLD, our sun is her mind light made visible.

Without it we could neither see nor think, nor feel nor be.

Without it we would never know love.

We didn't make ourselves, we didn't make the Sun.

The mind that shows us the Sun made us to see it, something had to.



This is why                 -
Cover for 'Little Book - Big Secret part one  The Ultimatum'

http://littlebookbigsecret-part1.blogspot.co.uk/2010/02/welcome-to-little-book-big-secret-part.html

Footnote -
If there is a speed of light it means that there already had to be enough TIME to accommodate it's travel.

Without time light could have no speed and therefore no motion.

Therefore, either time existed before light came in to BEING or infinite time and light came in to being at the same instant, but wait a minute, how could there have been an instant for light and time to be born in if there was not already time?

So time must have existed before the light.

Time is the light's abode and at least a part of the light's cause because light could not be caused without it having the time to exist in.

The question is what and where is the abode of TIME.?

Space?

The question is ... Where is the abode of space and how could it have been before it had time to exist in?

Where is OUR abode?

Consciousness perhaps?

But whose consciousness?

Whose being is it that time and light came in to?

And how did it come to be in the same place as time and light and space if it is the place of light's abode?

Could there be light without consciousness?

IS THERE light WITH consciousness?

Could there be conscious light?

Think about it, while you see by it, if YOU have the time to think.

Or is time what we think with?