Sunday, 17 February 2013

What are the odds?


  • Maybe there were no living Dinosaurs. Maybe 'the world' was created with all the 'fossils' intact in the rocks because God needed us to have the option of seeing the truth or not seeing through the story.

    Maybe it was all created one millisecond ago exactly as it is with all 'our memories' included?

    You have no way of knowing.
    Like ·  ·  ·  · Promote
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon Pretty cool, huh. XD
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon I love it when I see others post ideas that I've had myself and wondered if anyone else has ever wondered the same thing.
      10 hours ago · Unlike · 2
    • Ross Kelly All we have is memory, it's not physical at all.
      10 hours ago · Like · 2
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon Nope, it sure isn't. But do we also have pure "in the now" consciousness, forever transforming in to said memories?
      10 hours ago · Like · 1
    • Ross Kelly You had to look in to your memory to type that.
      10 hours ago · Like · 2
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon I say that is the only "real" thing we have....this moment...or rather, the perception of it.
      10 hours ago · Like · 1
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon Only to use the proper letters. lol
      10 hours ago · Like · 1
    • Ross Kelly Yes and it contains all the memories and they are all happening at the same time.
    • Ross Kelly No, that's not right Liz .. think again.
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon They are at that - what are we, but a conglomeration of all things past which have made us so. I see where you're coming from. Sensible. 
    • Ross Kelly Not HAVE made us so ARE making us so.
      10 hours ago · Like · 1
    • Linda Paolicchi We occupy bio-computer spacesuits that enable us to perceive physical reality. If your laptop computer stops functioning, you replace it with a new one. The "You" does not change...
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon Yes - inferred.  lol I have a bad habit of speaking in past tense. 
    • Ross Kelly Do we Linda? Perhaps you should look again?
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon We're receivers and senders of another's experience. All the world's a stage, and we are merely... etc etc...
    • Ross Kelly Think deeper, Am I really the one that is sending you 'my experience?
    • Steven Copper I exchanged dozens of long messages on this idea with Bernie. We came to the same conclusion, there is no way of knowing. We also thought that possibly the idea of personal identity is an illusion. For example, am I the same Steve that was here yesterday or a new Steve that inherited the memory of the old Steve (who is now dead) or does Steve not exist at all apart from as a biological entity. The idea of being an entity that inhabits a body is compulsive but it really could be an illusion if we are speaking in strictly scientific terms. Religion answers this question by proposing a soul and spirit but that is another debate.
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon ...and when I remember this, even if things seem shitty, life is an awful lot of fun!!
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon Ross - that depends on who I perceive you to be.
    • Ross Kelly No it doesn't Liz. It depends on who is sending you it.
    • Ross Kelly Nice to 'see you' here Steven.
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon Well I think we both know who that is. (: And we're all a part of that same singular entity.
      10 hours ago · Unlike · 1
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon And here that singular entity sits having a conversation with itself through all of us. Brilliant!!
    • Ross Kelly The truth is Steven, we don't inhabit a body, it just looks and feels like we do, it's ALL light.
      10 hours ago · Like · 1
    • Ross Kelly And that light is the light of the singular mind that is projecting it.
      10 hours ago · Like · 1
    • Ross Kelly There can only be one thing that is real because everything is real that is real.
      10 hours ago · Like · 1
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon And all of reality is - ONE.
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon Inseparable - no borders, no boundaries, no separation. Kinda cozy, eh. 
      10 hours ago · Unlike · 1
    • Ross Kelly Yes very, there is only one place.
    • Ross Kelly It was said " For you know not that you are all the sons of God"

      Each one of us sees 'our own' sun.
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon One place, one fabric - one, lovely one. 

      That we do, and there is a purpose for our perception of separation from the singularity, and the singularity knows what that is. It is for us to trust, from our human state of mind.
    • Glen Baillie Let there be light.
      10 hours ago via mobile · Unlike · 1
    • Ross Kelly No it's not it's for her to LIVE.
    • Steven Copper I'm not too convinced about this single entity thing and the idea that we are things of "its" imagination. What happens to free will? Is that simply another illusion. And then there's the question of moral responsibiity. I could knock off anyone I don't like and justify the act by saying that other people do not exist or that the single entity "made" me do it. If we apply Occam's razor then the only things that stand the test is stuff like E=mc2. Religious and philosophical dogma just get cut to shreds. While it is true that from a scientific viewpoint your idea cannot be disproved, it cannot be proved either.
    • Ross Kelly In a sense trust is distrust.
    • Ross Kelly Could you Steven? The answer is you don't know until it happens.
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon Yes, that is so. It can be difficult to juggle the states of mind required to discuss such an issue, if you know what I mean by that. There's the falsely perceived us, and then reality. And when switching between the two, things get jumbled. Or so I find.
    • Ross Kelly I have been trying to show you the proof Steven but you just don't seem to be able to grasp that it is yet.
    • Ross Kelly Here's something to think about

      I was just on a thread with a man named Cody who thought I was being unintelligent by mentioning God..

      There are 34 letters on my profile pic. They are a very very special anagram code.
      The letters relate to single digit numbers by the simplest logic possible, the 1-9 numerological alphabet. A = 1. 

      The letters in the date in this line are AO B AL.

      I have known about this code for 11 years. It is synchronised to time and a plan.

      It says -

      DATE PIN. .. 16.2.13 - ROSS' TIMER LINKS CODY THEN.
      35 minutes ago · Like

      Ross Kelly These are a few more anagrams of the same thing from a thread on a post by a man named Terry Allen on the 14th and 15th.

      Terry Allen This asteroid that is about to say Hello is it the one you have warned about Ross?
      about an hour ago · Edited · Like

      Ross Kelly I don't think so Terry but it IS a part of the warning, that's why the code relates to it in great detail.
      about an hour ago · Like

      Don Yeomans is the NASA NEO spokesman.

      I R.KELLY PIN THE DA14 ASTEROID ON 15.2.2013.

      I LINK THE PR TO RILE YEOMANS - DA14 15.2.2013.

      NEO I PIN IN R.KELLY PR - 15.2.2013 AD - 2012 DA14.

      I PIN 15.2.2013 AD NEO IN R.KELLY PR - 2012 DA14.

      DON YEOMANS, THIS PR I LINK TRACED 15.2.2013.

      And a reminder to piss him off some more -
      Here's something to think about Cody.

      There are 34 letters on my profile pic. They are a very very special anagram code.
      The letters relate to single digit numbers by the simplest logic possible, the 1-9 numerological alphabet. A = 1. 

      The letters in the date in this line are AO B AL.

      I have known about this code for 11 years. It is synchronised to time and a plan.

      It says -

      DATE PIN. .. 16.2.13 - ROSS' TIMER LINKS CODY THEN.
      35 minutes ago · Like

      Ross Kelly These are a few more anagrams of the same thing from a thread on a post by a man named Terry Allen.

      Terry Allen This asteroid that is about to say Hello is it the one you have warned about Ross?
      about an hour ago · Edited · Like

      Ross Kelly I don't think so Terry but it IS a part of the warning, that's why the code relates to it in great detail.
      about an hour ago · Like

      Don Yeomans is the NASA NEO spokesman.

      I R.KELLY PIN THE DA14 ASTEROID ON 15.2.2013.

      I LINK THE PR TO RILE YEOMANS - DA14 15.2.2013.

      NEO I PIN IN R.KELLY PR - 15.2.2013 AD - 2012 DA14.

      I PIN 15.2.2013 AD NEO IN R.KELLY PR - 2012 DA14.

      DON YEOMANS, THIS PR I LINK TRACED 15.2.2013.

      And a reminder to piss him off some more -

      HORNCASTLE'S METEOR DAY, I PIN IT ON 2.2.13 AD.

      43 minutes ago · Edited · Like

      Ross Kelly Re Horncastle in case you didn't see it Terry -

      http://thecelestialconvergence.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/fire-in-sky-green-fireball-flashes.html
      41 minutes ago · Like

      Ross Kelly ..

      DON'S 15.2.2013 DA14 LINE, IT IS TO HELP TERRY.
      12 minutes ago · Like

      Ross Kelly ..

      DA14 ON 15.2.2013, TERRY'S LINES ID IT TO HELP.

      They help by showing that your question is as preplanned as DA14 is.
      7 minutes ago · Like

      Ross Kelly ..

      DA14 - IT'S IN LINES ON 14.2.2013 TO HELP TERRY.
      5 minutes ago · Like

      the code kept on linking Don to the subject of Asteroids at the time of DA14 and the Russian meteor -

      CHELYABINSK METEOR - IS DON'S 15.2.2013 AD PR.

      DON'S PR ID'S CHELYABINSK METEOR - 9.20 -15.2.13.

      Sergei Serskov, who lives and works in the city of Chelyabinsk, was in his office at about 09:20 (03:20 GMT) when he was startled by a bright flash through the window.
      HORNCASTLE'S METEOR DAY, I PIN IT ON 2.2.13 AD.

      43 minutes ago · Edited · Like

      Ross Kelly Re Horncastle in case you didn't see it Terry -

      http://thecelestialconvergence.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/fire-in-sky-green-fireball-flashes.html
      41 minutes ago · Like

      Ross Kelly ..

      DON'S 15.2.2013 DA14 LINE, IT IS TO HELP TERRY.
      12 minutes ago · Like

      Ross Kelly ..

      DA14 ON 15.2.2013, TERRY'S LINES ID IT TO HELP.

      They help by showing that your question is as preplanned as DA14 is.
      7 minutes ago · Like

      Ross Kelly ..

      DA14 - IT'S IN LINES ON 14.2.2013 TO HELP TERRY.
      5 minutes ago · Like

      the code kept on linking Don to the subject of Asteroids at the time of DA14 and the Russian meteor -

      CHELYABINSK METEOR - IS DON'S 15.2.2013 AD PR.

      DON'S PR ID'S CHELYABINSK METEOR - 9.20 -15.2.13.

      Sergei Serskov, who lives and works in the city of Chelyabinsk, was in his office at about 09:20 (03:20 GMT) when he was startled by a bright flash through the window.

      For the record, the same letters say -

      BIAS TO No PI - 3.1415926535 - ARCHIMEDES 22/7.

      No = abbreviation for number.

      Ross Kelly One more then I'll leave you to figure it out ask yourself 'how did he find the letters?

      NB. I DATE ROSS' 16.2.13 PR, I LINK THE NAME CODY.
      10 hours ago · Like · 1
    • Steven Copper I'm still pondering mathematical probabilities in regard to these anagrams. I also need to get some scrabble pieces. It's 2.30 am here in Italy and I need to hit the sack.
    • Ross Kelly Me too.
    • Ross Kelly I'll tell you what Steven, YOU find another 34 letter code that consistently links in great timed detail to the people you come across and THE relevant events like the DA14 asteroid and the CHELYABINSK METEOR every day always in the same context, to prove to them that it is not random and that it is planned.

      Do it with the first 34 letters you pick, one try, like I had, the time factor connected to how long it took to happen is irrelevant. I got it right first time.

      There are two possibilities, either you will not find the code that is synchronised to you and the timed people you meet or you will.

      If you don't then ask yourself how on earth I did and why should there be such a thing to find anyway, how could it exist?

      And if you do, ask yourself what THAT means.
      9 hours ago · Edited · Like · 1
    • Elizabeth MacKinnon Lucky guess, Ross - lucky guess. ;D ((I'm kidding of course!!))
    • Ross Kelly Ana uses the A symbol to represent herself as well as I and also O of course, 3 aspects.
      A is number one after all.

      I, A, ID 5.6.1952 TO A MAN BY 34 LETTERS - S. COPPER.
      That's Steven's date of birth.

      Mathematical probability, hahaha.
      9 hours ago · Like · 1
    • Ross Kelly ..

      5.6.1952 COPPER'S 34 LETTERS TO ID 1 BY - I'M ANA.

      Note the way it was set up to verify my earlier statement about number 1 and who it logically represents.
      9 hours ago · Edited · Like · 1
    • Dayv Nicholas it really matters if you believe it or not ? the very fact it will happen if you believe it or not, you can spend time trying to disprove it, but to gain what, there is nothing to gain. you are still your own judge believe it or not.
    • Madailein Aisling Ireland I remember reading this a while back as a way to ridicule creationists. I mostly do think their ideas are nonsensical, but when I read this one I thought, that's actually kind of cool, I mean how would we ever know? Thanks for posting this in a different context.
      3 hours ago · Unlike · 1
    • Ross Kelly Quote - "God is a God of the living".
    • Madailein Aisling Ireland So odd that Ockham's (or Occam) razor came up as tonight, completely independent of this post or comments came across some startling information on the Razor--startling to me because i have wielded it myself many a time to win many an argument thinking it to be the pinnacle of reason and logic. I kid you not, I posted my discovery as my status on fb because I was stunned by what i found out. The truth is that it should be called Russell's Razor because Betrand Russell is the person who gave its current interpretation. Believe it or not, and trust me, I had a lot of cognitive dissonance with this) is that Ockham was a theist and the actual Razor Ockham shaved with is this:

      "For nothing ought to be posited without a reason given, unless it is self-evident or known by experience or proved by the authority of Sacred Scripture."
    • Madailein Aisling Ireland That information blew my mind. I still plan to wield the Razor, but I'm sourcing it correctly from now on. How odd that some obscure guy's theistic quote has morphed into what it has. And why not tribute it correctly? Wouldn't one think Russell more well-known? I mean it's not like Ockham was a scientist or anything.
    • Ross Kelly In this article it is calculated that the odds of a very near miss asteroid passing by Earth on the day that Earth gets hit by a separate - quote "unrelated" significant meteor strike event are one in one hundred million. (total nonsense of course, it either happens or it doesn't)

      http://edition.cnn.com/2013/02/16/opinion/urry-meteor-asteroid/?hpt=hp_bn7

      That's once every 100,000,000 days. which is once every 274536 years.

      So, that being the theoretical mathematical statistic how likely is it then that my possession of a code that relates in great detail to the timing of both events should not only be factual but also actually occur concurrently with the happening?

      What are the mathematical odds ?

      If you take a lifetime as being 70 years the cosmic event would by that same reckoning occur once in 3921 lifetimes.

      So that means my lifetime in which I have possession of the code just happened to have happened timed to the last of the possible lifetime periods in that 274536 year span. Mathematically speaking it would not have happened simultaneously had my lifetime been any other 70 years in that enormous time span.

      Yet happen it did as my blog amply demonstrates and people still don't get it. Chance coincidence does not exist any more than a chance it'self does.

      The thing that does exist is INCREDIBLE INTELLIGENCE. -

      http://synchronicitywins.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/dons-fail.html
      A meteor and asteroid: 1 in 100 million odds
      www.cnn.com
      Meg Urry says the probability that a meteor hits and an asteroid passes by Earth on the same day is about 1 in 100 million.





....
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)