Synchronicity wins: Irony and light.

Updated Aug 19 and Aug 21.

Ross Kelly

What would LIGHT be if there was never a living mind to perceive it?

Bishop DeCastle Ross Kelly: It's sad that you ask such STUPID - FUCKING QUESTIONS !!! - Light would be light, whether or not a mind could perceive it. Sound would be sound...

LikeReply3 hrs

Hide 87 Replies

Tommy Hall lol

LikeReply13 hrs

Bishop DeCastle UNGH - I haven't had enough coffee for this level of stupidity...

LikeReply3 hrs

Hank Jamieson I have.

LikeReply13 hrs

Ross Kelly Would it?... really?.. are you sure?

LikeReply2 hrs

Ross Kelly WOULD be?

LikeReply2 hrs

Tommy Hall Ross Kelly positively yes

LikeReply12 hrs

Tommy Hall Ross Kelly What makes you think it wouldn't be,Ross

LikeReply2 hrs

Ross Kelly Light.

LikeReply2 hrs

Tommy Hall Ross Kelly ?

LikeReply2 hrs

Ross Kelly When you read the word light what light do you think of?

LikeReply2 hrs

Tommy Hall Ross Kelly lack of darkness

LikeReply2 hrs

Bishop DeCastle Ross Kelly "LIGHT" WHEN YOU READ THE WORD "LIGHT", YOU THINK OF THE WORD "LIGHT" (depending on how the word is presented in a sentence)

LikeReply2 hrs

Ross Kelly Why do you have to do that when it is light that is allowing you to see the word light.

Why do you ignore THAT light, the light that is illuminating your own living mind right NOW?

LikeReply2 hrs

Ross Kelly The ACTUAL light.

LikeReply2 hrs

Ross Kelly The light that you take for 'granted', because it is.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly The light that without which you could not be.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly The light you RECEIVE and do not create.

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle you mean the light from the sun?

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly The light that has shown you EVERYTHING that you have ever seen.

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle What about blind people ?

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly What about them?

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle Blind people cannot see light

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly AND?

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle and what?

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly wHAT IS YOUR POINT?

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle I thought we were talking about light.....

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle (lol)

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly We are, without it you can't see anything.. lol.

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle Alright - well, thanks for the "ILLUMINATING" conversation - AHHHHHH- BAhahahahahaha (get it) - Bahaha

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly The blind just led the blind again!

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle Well, I don't know about you, but I can see pretty clearly.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly So why did you have to ask me if I meant the light of the Sun?

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle That was sarcasm

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly There is a great deal more to "the light of the sun" than you realise.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly You can not know that unless you are directly shown by it.

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle FACTS please Ross: It seems that when you reference "light" you are referring to theist beliefs. So instead of playing "word games" (not that it hasn't been fun) - can we get to the point please ?

LikeReply11 hr

Bishop DeCastle Also - please provide evidence for your position.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly I am not a Christian or follower of any other religion and I know that if there was a Jesus he was a man like you and I are (in the grand story of things at least)

That Man is reported to have said in order to know God first you must see the light.

When asked what light he spoke of he said, "the light that I speak of is the light that lights every man that comes in to the world"

He also saidwHEN A MAN HAS A LIGHT HE PUTS IT ON THE MANTEL FOR ALL TO SEE AND SO IT IS WITH GOD'S LIGHT.

He was inferring that God's light is here for all to see too, in an obvious place but people fail to comprehend the meaning of those words.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly From time to time, when it is necessary, a few people have been shown what he meant.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly Not a single person who says they are an Atheist has EVER been shown nor ever will be because the moment you are you are no longer an atheist.

LikeReply1 hr

Hank Jamieson Who?
(..fer instance.).

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly Me for instance, my wife too, another man I knew as well, he knew before we did.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly All of the other 'Sun men' that most religions were fabricated around or copied from.

LikeReply1 hr

Hank Jamieson I do not know about sun men.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly The Sun is not what you think it is.

LikeReply1 hr

Hank Jamieson What do I think it is?
What is it?

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly Most of the old religions were based around people who knew about the Sun.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly As the ancient Phonecians knew and stated "the sun is the fountainhead of divine mind pouring light into it's own abode".

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly Akenhaton, Zoroaster, those sort of people.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly Ahura Mazda

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle Ross Kelly: Ross, you are referring to a “con-man” argument:

The argument is; “In order to experience god, you must first believe in god”. ...See more

LikeReply1 hr

Hank Jamieson How did these olde peeps know about our star?

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly No, it's nothing like that at all.

Sometimes it is necessary for little so called interventions to occur, the person it happens to in order that they can be used with knowledge of why they are being used and how they are being used probably had little clue about it before it came to light.

It has nothing to do with asking or praying.

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle You can change the parameters of this argument any way you like:

The argument is; “In order to experience allah, you must first believe in allah”. ...See more

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly Curiosity was no doubt given to them prior to the reason for it becoming apparent.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly They knew about it by being given direct one on one experience of it in a way that others have not yet had, at least, not in this current life time.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly Yes, well, Bishop, it is plain to see why it was not you.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly Believing in God has nothing to do with it.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly Looking for reality has a LOT to do with it.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly Choice does not come in to it.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly So called choices are given too.

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle Ross Kelly : AND THERE YOU GO – THE 2ND PART OF THE “CON” = IF YOU ARE NOT EXPIERENCING GOD, THEN THERE IS “SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOU”… - Either you are not a good enough Christian, or YOU are not praying enough…. But the problem is YOU…..

This is how the con-game is played. The person pulling “the con” would have you believe that there is something wrong with you, or that You are doing something wrong…

The TRUTH, is that there was never any “god” in the first place. You see, if there were a god, there would be EVIDENCE for that god.

But there is NO evidence, which is why the con is necessary.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly I didn't say there is something wrong with you.

How could there be?

God is having you be exactly who you are.

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle The “CON” is also successful because people do not understand that when they pray and / or meditate, endorphins are released into the brain. Theists will often times experience these endorphins, and believe that they are experiencing the god that theythink is real.

Endorphins (short for “endogenous morphine”) are neurotransmitters secreted by the pituitary gland.

Endorphins are produced during orgasm, exercise, excitement, pain and when we eat spicy or hot food. They regulate the production of growth and sex hormones. They control cravings and feelings of frustration and stress.
Endorphins are also responsible for the all-over happiness we get when we’re in love.

When everything hurts and you are “at your limit” it’s hard to stay motivated. Ah, but then there is that magical moment when the endorphin's enter the system like so many fans and cheerleaders. Pain disappears, you suddenly “find your legs” and perceived physical limits disappear.
Meditation can elicit these same feelings of joy. A 2003 study by Goteborg University in Sweden reported that endorphins are also triggered by the extreme relaxation of a float tank - similar to the profound relaxation experienced during meditation.
Another study by the School of Behavioral Sciences at the James Cook University of North Queensland, Australia, compared elite runners and trained meditators. Although running and meditation are obviously different metabolic activities, the researchers predicted that mood changes after running or meditating would be similar. Indeed, that is what they found.
Compared to pre-test moods (and those of a control group), both running and meditating elicited a positive mood change.
Meditation stimulates the pituitary gland and the hypothalamus, thus releasing endorphins. Meditation also increases production of serotonin, dopamine and melatonin, all related to positive moods, happiness and relaxation.
Meditators are generally happier, more centered and less prone to anger and frustration than non-meditators.
You can achieve the euphoric “runner’s high” from meditating, without ever leaving the comfort of your own mind!

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly Yawn.

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle I know - facts are boring - it's so much easier to just say "god did it" - LOL

LikeReply1 hr

Bishop DeCastle No thinking required.

LikeReply11 hr

Matt Nelson Holy shit, this guy is crazier than I thought at first!

LikeReply144 mins

Bishop DeCastle Matt Nelson: Yeah - average nut-ball theist... I love the argument; "If you just believe in my god, then you will experience that god"... What a disingenuous argument... Lets completely ignore the fact that if there were evidence for that god, then people would believe without question. IF a god existed, then "you" would have "KNOWLEDGE" and there would be no need for "BELIEF".

LikeReply135 minsEdited

Ross Kelly You are making up the words you claim I am saying, you need to read the thread again.

I told you that BELIEF means nothing at all, I would NEVER tell you to BELIEVE anything.

LikeReply33 minsEdited

Bishop DeCastle Ross you are dancing around the point. "If a man is shown the light"... "Once shown"..... "You must believe to know.".. It's all the same / all a part of the same con-game.

LikeReply29 minsEdited

Bishop DeCastle "You are who god wants you to be".... (which negates "free-will") - It's all a part of the same con-game used by "snake oil salesmen".

LikeReply28 mins

Ross Kelly You haven't got a clue what I have been talking about.

LikeReply28 mins

Bishop DeCastle OK, so enlighten me. Make your point.

LikeReply27 mins

Ross Kelly .

LikeReply26 mins

Bishop DeCastle If I just "BELIEVE" that you stated something above, will I see it ?

LikeReply21 mins

Ross Kelly No, you have to look more closely.

LikeReply20 mins

Bishop DeCastle LOL

LikeReply20 mins

Bishop DeCastle Oh is that you making your "point" ?....

LikeReply19 mins

Ross Kelly You asked me to make a point and I did, here's another one .

LikeReply19 mins

Bishop DeCastle Don't quit your day job. Comedy is NOT your forte.

LikeReply18 mins

Ross Kelly Actually, it's not meant to be funny, that dot is all the proof you should need but the trouble is you can't understand why it is and probably never will.

LikeReply16 mins

Ross Kelly Anyway, enough wading through bollocks for one day,

Bye.

LikeReply15 mins

Bishop DeCastle Yes... the problem is "ME"... Of course it is... it's always someone else - nothing to do with your lack of facts. 'Have a good day Ross.

LikeReply12 mins

Ross Kelly Perhaps one more thing.

That letter set you see on my profile picture is an anagram code that I was led to by God using synchronicity to do it in 2002.

This is a perfect anagram of it.

IRONY - BISHOP DE CASTLE, MATT NELSON, AID R.K.

Ibet you can't see how.

LikeReply11 mins

Ross Kelly (I'm R.K)

LikeReply10 mins

Ross Kelly Thanks guys.

LikeReply4 mins

Write a reply...

Then it continued like this -

20 hrs

Bishop DeCastle Ross Kelly: If a god existed, it would make its self-known to all. There would be no need for "belief" as we would have "knowledge".

The reason that you see an "anagram code", is because that is what you WANT to see. Your belief that a deity has created it for you, is a form of self-hypnosis. You have convinced yourself that it is something that it is not.

Your “anagram code” is no more valid, then the information that people have extracted from the bible, which they use to predict the “end times” (what are we on, 6 or 7 raptures now?).

LikeReply19 hrs

Ross Kelly BELIEVE what YOU like to believe if that's the limit of 'knowledge' that you are granted.

She wasn't very generous with that in your case but hey, she made SOME use of you.

How do you know what God would do?

The fact is that there are times when everyone knows and times when the meaning of ignorance is expressed in the time story so that people can, when the time is right, understand.

The two polarities are expressed equally, all the meaning there is is expressed in the polar ages.

Right now you along with the majority of other people only have your beliefs to cling to and in that you are equal.

Some people believe some kind of version of god exists and some people believe that not to be the case.

Either way KNOWING plays no part in it.

It makes neither of you evil.

LikeReply18 hrs

Bishop DeCastle Ross Kelly And here is where your argument falls apart = PROVE IT !!!... PROVE that a god exists. If an all-powerful deity actually exists, proving its existence should be relatively simple.

Next PROVE that this deity provided you with an "anagram code".

LikeReply18 hrs

Ross Kelly I just did.

LikeReply18 hrs

Bishop DeCastle Ross Kelly no you didn't

LikeReply18 hrs

Bishop DeCastle Actual fact based, verifiable evidence.

LikeReply18 hrs

Ross Kelly OK, you're right, correction, God just did.

LikeReply18 hrs

Bishop DeCastle So far, all you have posted is nonsense.

LikeReply18 hrs

Bishop DeCastle Do you understand the defination of "evidence"?

LikeReply18 hrs

Bishop DeCastle Listen, you are obviously delusional and you have completely embraced the delusion. If you have ACTUAL evidence that you would like to present in this discussion, then by all means, please feel free to present it. Otherwise, I wish you the best. You can lie to yourself all you like, but you can't expect others to embrace your lies.

LikeReply18 hrsEdited

Ross Kelly Look at the letters on my profile picture and see if they do in fact say what I showed you they say then go and ask a mathematician what the odds against that occurring are.

Or the odds of me being in a little FB thread with two people who are in denial of God named Bishop DeCastle and Matt Nelson both of whom are responding to my post.

If that's not ironic what is?

LikeReply18 hrs

Bishop DeCastle Ross Kelly No it is NOT ironic. This is FB, and discussions like this take place 24/7.

LikeReply18 hrs

Bishop DeCastle Also - there is no mathematical significance to the picture that you are referencing.

LikeReply18 hrs

Ross Kelly Given that the little code does in verifiable fact just happen to say that.

How convenient for me, what a stroke of luck.

LikeReply18 hrs

Bishop DeCastle Ross Kelly there is no mathematical significance to the picture that you are referencing.

LikeReply18 hrs

Ross Kelly OK, I see the problem now.

Cheers.

LikeReply18 hrs

Bishop DeCastle In fact, there is nothing signifigant about Tony Blair at all.

LikeReply18 hrs

Bishop DeCastle Ross Kelly The reason that you see an "anagram code", is because that is what you WANT to see. Your belief that a deity has created it for you, is a form of self-hypnosis. You have convinced yourself that it is something that it is not.

Your “anagram code” is no more valid, then the information that people have extracted from the bible, which they use to predict the “end times”

LikeReply18 hrs

Ross Kelly http://synchronicitywins.blogspot.co.uk/.../what-are-odds...

Synchronicity wins: What are the odds?.

SYNCHRONICITYWINS.BLOGSPOT.COM|BY ROSS KELLY

LikeReplyRemove Preview18 hrs

Bishop DeCastle Ross Kelly Oh I SEE… I SEE IT NOW…… You are a person that has experienced numerous forms of trauma throughout your life, and have embraced a delusional fantasy.

LikeReply18 hrs

Ross Kelly As you would.

LikeReply18 hrs

Bishop DeCastle No, I became a behavioral specialist.

LikeReply17 hrs

Ross Kelly OH, I'm impressed, a specialist.

LikeReply17 hrs

Ross Kelly Have you looked in the mirror lately. lol.

LikeReply17 hrs

Ross Kelly Did you read the blog post?

LikeReply17 hrs

Bishop DeCastle Ross Kelly this isn't evidence of anything. I know that WANT this to be evidence, I'm sorry, but it just isn't.

LikeReply17 hrs

Ross Kelly Actually, it is .

It is evidence that you have an extremely limited comprehension ability.

I suggest that you should take up knitting or chasing Pokemons or fishing or something, something that does not require you to have the ability to reason.

LikeReply16 hrs

Bishop DeCastle Of course you would suggest something like that - pokemon are about as real as the god that you believe in.

LikeReply15 hrs

Bishop DeCastle Ross Kelly psssst - Pokemon aren't real ya know....

LikeReply15 hrs

Ross Kelly Quote - Bishop DeCastle Ross Kelly there is no mathematical significance to the picture that you are referencing.

You were referring to the code formula on my profile picture.

The code relates to numbers by single digit 1-9 alphabetic numerology, the same system that all numerologists work with.

The whole thing is based on Pi, everything is, language, the time plan, our names, every word that exists, everything that happens in our lives.

As it has been said before, in the beginning was the word.

The formulation of words and their meanings was designed mentally by God before the time story began.

This is for you and Matt, the same 2 that have already been put together in the code for the purpose of that demonstration on this thread.

This is an anagram of that letter set in my profile picture that I discovered in the code about 7 years after being led to complete the formula -

BIAS TO No PI - 3.1415926535 - ARCHIMEDES 22/7.

(No is Number)

The bias in the code not only shows decimal Pi to 10 decimal places, the letters left over name the man who is commonly thought to have discovered an approximation of the Pi ratio 22/7, Archimedes no less.

This is a mini code that has great relevance here, it says -

CODE BIAS HELPS 2.

3.1415926 HELPS 2.

(The letters in CODE BIAS are the first 8 digits of Pi.)

You and Matt are the 2 it refers to.

LikeReply4 minsEdited

Note -

Bishop DeCastle hasn't seen the punchline yet and the further irony!

This name is the mini code -

BISHOP DECASTLE.

The whole code previously demonstrated says -

3.1415926 HELPS 2, Nos LINK IRONY MATT READ.

(Because the mini code is the other name in the irony line)

Names are planned.

This one...

RICHARD DAWKINS.

Is an anagram of ....

RASH DARWIN DICK.

A Dick among other things means IDIOT

It's also the short form of Richard.

August 21, another part of the same thread.

Noel Rabina posted this Spiderman meme today

Noel S. Rabina

LikeReply28 mins

Ross Kelly Noel S. Rabina

The letters on my profile picture are one line of an anagram code formula that synchronicity led me to complete in 2002.

Letters correspond to numbers by the simple logic of 1-9 single digit Alphabet numerology, A =1, start at 1 again after 9.

O or a blank space represent zero in the cypher.

It says this too -

2 IN 21.8.2016 KELLY CODE - SPIDERMAN - RABINA.

If you think that happens to be there by chance you are totally stupid.

LikeReply3 mins

Ross Kelly It's God's formula.

LikeReplyJust now

Ross Kelly Using the blank space zero it says -

SPIDERMAN IN 21.8.2016 KELLY CODE TO RABINA.

LikeReplyJust now

Ross Kelly God wrote ALL the books.

8 mins

Ross Kelly So here's a question for you Noel.

Where is the light that you can see the Spiderman meme by coming from?

Just for the record, just before you posted the Spiderman picture my son Andrew and I were discussing Spiders, that is how I knew to look in the code when you posted it, synchronicity.

Screenshot of the thread.

This is a comment stream under a post of that screenshot in a 'Philosophy' group.

God help us!

Comments

Kalle Last Point being?

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly I'll just leave you to think about it.

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly Or not.

LikeReply1 hr

Kalle Last You made a wild assertion about it being possible to translate numbers into letters and made even wilder claims that this somehow proves god.

Do you happen to be the same guy I had a chat with about syncroncity on Twitter a couple of years ago who one day saw total solar eclipse (IIRC in early 90's) and through some weird leaps of logic thought that is proof of god?

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly No.

LikeReply1 hr

Kalle Last Yeah, seems like you aren't this guy: https://twitter.com/RobinEdgar

Robin Edgar (@RobinEdgar) | Twitter

The latest Tweets from Robin Edgar (@RobinEdgar). Photographer & Videographer Basking In The Untold…

TWITTER.COM

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly A=1

Is that so hard for you to understand?

LikeReply1 hr

Kalle Last How do you know A=1?

LikeReply1 hr

Ross Kelly It's the same logic that the science of numerology is based on.

I'm not a numerologist but that's how the CODE works.

LikeReply58 mins

Srinivas Ramlal Putta When did numerology become science?

LikeReply48 mins

Write a reply...

Christopher Thomas God. Is about as real as Spiderman. That's the moral of the story

LikeReply57 mins

Ross Kelly http://synchronicitywins.blogspot.co.uk/.../irony-and...

Synchronicity wins: Irony and light.

SYNCHRONICITYWINS.BLOGSPOT.COM|BY ROSS KELLY

LikeReplyRemove Preview55 mins

Kalle Last Science of numerology? What exactly makes it to be science?

Also, what about alphabets of other languages?

How do you know it's "kelly code"? Numerology alphabet table doesn't correspond to that "translation"

LikeReply53 mins

Ross Kelly I'm Kelly.

LikeReply53 mins

Ross Kelly Go get a brain.

LikeReply52 mins

Kalle Last Can you provide the translation number->letter table you used to "translate" those numbers?

LikeReply51 minsEdited

Kalle Last Also, yes, sorry. It was somewhat unclear what was the result of the translation you gave on that image.

LikeReply51 mins

Ross Kelly Exactly the same formula says this -

BIAS TO No PI - 3.1415926535 - ARCHIMEDES 22/7.

No = number.

LikeReply49 mins

Kalle Last Please provide the conversion formula so I could try this out myself.

I can't see how using this can reach to those results you are showing:

LikeReply48 mins

Ross Kelly That's it.

LikeReply48 mins

Ross Kelly The letters are on my profile picture.

LikeReply46 mins

Kalle Last Wait, I think I may have got it.

You use that table to translate a sequence of numbers to letters while being able to choose one of three different options for each and then rearrange them in an attempt to make sense?

LikeReply45 mins

Ross Kelly It says this too -

NICE SPIDERMAN ROBIN DAY TO KALLE ..21.8.2016.

(From Anna)

LikeReply44 mins

Ross Kelly No, I don't.

LikeReply43 mins

Kalle Last how are you doing it, then? I'm quite fascinated by the exact methodology you use. Could you go through some simple example step by step?

LikeReply43 mins

Ross Kelly They are all the same letters in the code lines, not their numerical counterparts.

LikeReply42 mins

Ross Kelly Use a scrabble set, select the same letters that you see on my profile picture and check the anagrams I've shown you.

LikeReply41 mins

Kalle Last I'm not sure how exactly considering you lack several letters on your image and there are more letters in total than are in English alphabet.

LikeReply39 mins

Ross Kelly In that nice day greeting the name Robin is the name that you gave me from your twitter thing.

LikeReply39 mins

Ross Kelly All the lines use the exact same letters that you can see on my picture, no more, no less, the same ones every time.

LikeReply38 mins

Kalle Last What lines are you talking about?

Is the translation table like this?

LikeReply37 mins

Ross Kelly No.

634 74 2657 23199 ETC.

LikeReply36 mins

Ross Kelly Each letter has a single alphabetically arranged number as it is in the order of the Roman Alphabet.

LikeReply34 mins

Kalle Last Ok. Are you translating from numeric sequences such as value of Pi to letters or from letters to numbers?

LikeReply34 mins

Kalle Last Is it the modern or older alphabet that lacked the letter U?

LikeReply33 mins

Ross Kelly The code's symbol for it'self is O, it was created by Anna (otherwise spelt Ana, she is God.

This is another ANAgram of THE SAME LETTERS -

KELLY'S O CIPHER ID'S A1, B2, D4, E5, I9, N5, O6 S1,T2..

LikeReply30 mins

Ross Kelly That's the code it'self showing you that I did not choose it's numbering system.

LikeReply28 mins

Ross Kelly The letters in my profile picture have their corresponding numbers on the back of them, is that difficult for you to grasp?

LikeReply25 mins

Kalle Last I'm not understanding how did you get ARCHIMEDES from 3.1415926535. Could you show exactly how did you replace numbers and letters?

LikeReply24 mins

Ross Kelly I'm sorry to have to ask but are you on meds or something?

BIAS TO No PI - 3.1415926535 - ARCHIMEDES 22/7

iS AN ANAGRAM OF... WAIT FOR IT....

OLD PM TONY BLAIR'S EINSTEIN DATA SHOCKER.

LikeReply21 mins

Ross Kelly AND AN ANAGRAM OF -

NICE SPIDERMAN ROBIN DAY TO KALLE ..21.8.2016

LikeReply20 mins

Ross Kelly AND AN ANAGRAM OF -

KELLY'S O CIPHER ID'S A1, B2, D4, E5, I9, N5, O6 S1,T2..

LikeReply19 mins

Ross Kelly They are ALL anagrams of THE SAME THING.

LikeReply18 mins

Ross Kelly So are the code lines in the screenshot.

LikeReply17 mins

Kalle Last How can you get 3.1415926535 from "bias to no pi" when "bias to no pi" has two of number 6?

LikeReply13 minsEdited

Ross Kelly Are you actually bothering to read what I just told you?

LikeReply13 mins

Ross Kelly Here it is again, don't blink or you'll miss it -

BIAS TO No PI - 3.1415926535 - ARCHIMEDES 22/7

iS AN ANAGRAM OF... WAIT FOR IT....

OLD PM TONY BLAIR'S EINSTEIN DATA SHOCKER.

LikeReply12 mins

Kalle Last wait, are you saying that you aren't really using the conversion table to translate the value of pi to either "bias to no pi" or "archimedes"?

Are you just giving two random strings of words and find them to be anagrams?

LikeReply11 mins

Ross Kelly How the f*ck did you ever programme a computer?

LikeReply9 mins

Ross Kelly http://synchronicitywins.blogspot.co.uk/.../big-pi-key...

Synchronicity wins: The big Pi key discovery.

SYNCHRONICITYWINS.BLOGSPOT.COM

LikeReplyRemove Preview9 mins

Ross Kelly Now I understand why your first question was ..

Point being?

LikeReplyJust now

24 mins

Kalle Last I program computers because there are clear instructions on how they work and how programming languages work so it's possible to understand it without confusion.

You aren't explaining things, just pasting same thing all over again without any extra explaining.

LikeReply15 mins

Ross Kelly Do you know what an Anagram is Kalle?

Code anagram aptly timed -

NB. 21.8.2016 IRONY - PI.. 3.14159265 - KALLE'S MIND..

The whole thread that later occurred can be seen on a new blog post -

http://synchronicitywins.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/my-day-with-kalle.html

...........................................................

.........................

Synchronicity wins

Thursday, 18 August 2016

Irony and light.

Updated Aug 19 and Aug 21.

Ross Kelly

Comments

No comments:

Post a Comment

BOWEN ROCK

About Me

Thursday, 18 August 2016

Irony and light.

Updated Aug 19 and Aug 21.Ross Kelly

Comments

No comments:

Post a Comment

Updated Aug 19 and Aug 21.

Ross Kelly