Wednesday 27 July 2011

Mathieson and 'Particle' linked to by Ross.


Updated 10.26 pm



Really! I'm shocked LOL! Stupid bunch of retarded scientists

www.independent.co.uk
Fevered speculation about the discovery of the so-called

22 hours ago ·  ·  · 

  • XEquals RDspared and 8 others like this.

    • James W. Parker That term is just misleading..they're just looking for the Higgs bosOn particle...just an element that is supposed to unify the different elements in the universe..it probably does exist in some form or another..
      22 hours ago ·  ·  2 people

    • Ross Kelly God is the only thing that is not a particle, if Ron is a scientist...he's been had.
      21 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker OMG...are you serious Ross...it is a metaphorical term...irrationalists piss me off!!!!...It is a term meaning a unifying and quantifiable particle that binds other particles together...so yes the metaphor is apt..if you want to give god an ego like a human being and make him a separate dude..then that's no different than defining him as a particle..because that's all you are..and if god is everything then yes he'd be a particle because everything is made up of particles...
      21 hours ago ·  ·  1 person

    • Ross Kelly You're obviously very bright then James....not!
      21 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly Mind the gap.
      21 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker WOW...that was a clever come back...I couldn't tell what you meant..thanks for explaining that..you put some effort into that...
      21 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker Instead of rationally responding to my points you just say "NOT"..hahaha..made yourself look good there
      21 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker In fact if "GOD" on any quantifiable level didn't exist he'd still be a particle as an idea because all our thoughts and ideas are bio-chemical reactions..which in tern are made up of particles..huh..
      21 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly Oh, your thoughts are bio chemical reactions are they...well, that's a thought!
      21 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly Goodnight.
      21 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker WOW..they are bio-chemical reactions..even if they are more than that and that is only a physical manifestation of them they still are technically bio-chemical reactions..we can measure it....
      21 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker You have nothing huh....ok I won't pick on the weak...
      21 hours ago · 

    • Jon Smyth No one ever said that it was definite that the Higg's Boson was going to be found. People read far too much into this. The particle has to be found to prove the "Higg's Field Theory" - which is just a "Theory" (http://dictionary.referenc​e.com/browse/theory) that provides one possible explanation for how other particles gain mass. If they can't prove the theory or if the theory is disproved, they move on and try something else. Of course egos are often scared and there may be fits of pique - but this is how real science differs from bunk science. You test things till they break. When you stop doing this you have pretty much entered the realms of bunk.
      21 hours ago ·  ·  2 people

    • James W. Parker That is what makes science different from any ideology out there..in its true purest form devoid or as devoid as we can get of the human ego...it is a beautiful thing....
      21 hours ago ·  ·  1 person

    • Brian Mathieson True James, but we have to beware of scientisms... so as to keep an open mind. Refhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wi​ki/Scientism

      20 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker I agree...but remember scientism isn't science..it is just turning such a thing into another ideology...I think humans always do this with everything..including politics and spirituality because it is a way of control for the powerful and an easy out for the weak minded..
      20 hours ago ·  ·  1 person

    • Cato Watts Don Juan to Calos Castaneda-"the only thing they are going to figure out is that something is going on"
      20 hours ago · 

    • Brian Mathieson Well so long as you understand that we all don't consider spirituality for the weakminded as you say. Thats folishness... YES Scientism is like putting science-like notions out there... but its not real science. I would argue that most peiople do not have a grasp of real science at all. YET we often see people hold it up as a kind of religion.
      20 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker Interesting thing about Don Juan is it was proven he didn't exist and that Carlos was a crazy liar who ended his psychotic life surrounded by bimbos...I read his work intently....That man was a lying bastard who shit on any kind of spirituality we could and could still get out of the Latin American Indians with a fraud...all for a little greed..don't quote that trash!
      20 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker I never said spirituality was for the weak minded..you misunderstood me..I said humans like to turn things like politics and spirituality into dogma or ideology because it is easier to toss to the masses and easier to control others..spirituality turned into dogma or ideology would be say the Catholic Church or organized Religious Fundamentalism
      20 hours ago ·  ·  1 person

    • James W. Parker oh and Cato...they interviewed the woman who was Don Juan's "wife" that Carlos supposedly knew and she said he never hung out with him..that it was all bullshit...there are tons of witnesses contradicting that false prophets books...
      20 hours ago · 

    • Cato Watts the quote itself is what is true and important sorry you cant see that no offense
      20 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker I think the quote is redundant and foolish..I don't see the value in making an obvious statement that the only thing we will discover is that there is something going on?..Carlos was a good creative writer and that sounds truly prolific without any good meaning behind the words...so t he quote is ridiculous in my opinion...Of course we are going to discover intricacies and how things associate with each other..then yes we'll label them so we can categorize the stuff and yes we will always have bigger questions to answer after each discover but the only thing we are going to find out is that there is something going on?..That sounds so dumb..
      20 hours ago ·  ·  1 person

    • James W. Parker Well we found that out the first five minutes of self-awareness as a species..so I guess that's all we are going to discover...whatever..
      20 hours ago ·  ·  1 person

    • Cato Watts it has no beginning and cannot be broken into into the smallest part
      20 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker Of course it cannot be broken into its smallest part..but we will continue the quest and the search..and yes we can identify how things work at certain levels...and in fact the theory of a fractal holographic universe answers that question and gives room for our understanding of it and allowing for no beginning or end since in a fractal hologram the smaller you get the pattern just repeats..so you just figure out some of the pattern and you'll discover the whole pattern
      20 hours ago ·  ·  1 person

    • James W. Parker You have a mind ten times more insightful than that quack did trust me Cato...There are better..much better gurus to read spiritually and scientifically
      20 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker Read Alan Watts or Eckhart Tolle to get insight into our understanding of Self...Read the long Array of Quantum physicists to work into an understanding or beginning of an an understanding of how the Universe connects and dances with itself...Not a retard and known skizophrenic who saw a quick buck by lying to the public..
      20 hours ago ·  ·  1 person

    • Ross Kelly The
      13 hours ago · 

    • Shirley Kobiela Brian - I would argue that most peiople do not have a grasp of reality at all. A friend just posted this on the Ana code wall - http://www.henrymakow.com/​in_the_sleep_room.html

      www.henrymakow.com
      Henry Makow's official web site. Exposing Feminism and the New World Order

      12 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly ‎..

      CODE, BRIAN MATHIESON, AND R.KELLY POSTS IT.

      11 hours ago ·  ·  1 person

    • Ross Kelly The line above is an anagram of the words on my profile picture.
      The code proves that nothing is random and that James is wrong.
      The 'key' was completed in 2002 and is synchronised to a plan. The mind that devised it also devised you and is not a particle.
      That mind based the whole time story of our lives and the English language on Pi.
      The code's symbol for it'self is O. The definition of O is..a cipher.
      Time is a circle.
      The code uses basic single digit logic to represent numbers A= 1 etc.

      These are all anagrams of the key.

      The Pi line at the top was discovered 7 years after the code was completed.

      BIAS TO No PI - 3.1415926535 - ARCHIMEDES 22/7.

      MY CODE BIAS HINTS TO PARKER - 3.1415926535.

      THE 3.14159265 O IS BY A MIND, NOT PARTICLES.

      THEOS IS BY MIND NOT A PARTICLE - 3.14159265.

      MIND NOTES PI BY O - 3.14159265. IS THAT CLEAR?

      22/7 - 3.141592653 IS MATHIESON PARKER CODE.

      IT'S REAL PI CODE MATHIESON - 3.14159265.

      R.K'S REAL PI CODE MATHIESON - 3.14159265.

      PI BY ME TO HADRON SCIENTISTS - 3.141592653.

      PI BY HADRON ATOM SCIENTIST - 3.1415926535.

      SCIENTISTS DOOM PARKER BY - 3.14159265358.

      PARKER DOOMS SCIENTISTS BY 3.141592653358.

      (Because they got it wrong just like arrogant Mr Parker)

      9 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly ‎..

      CODE, IT TIMES HADRON LINKS - 27.7.2011...LEARN.

      8 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly ‎..

      O DETAILS CERN'S HADRON LINK TIME - 27.7.2011.

      8 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly ‎..

      27.7.2011 O TIMED HADRON LINKS, CERN SEALS IT.

      8 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly ‎..

      I, LORD, DATE CERN'S LINK MATHIESON - 27.7.2011.

      8 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly ‎..

      READ 27.7.2011 CERN LINKS I TOLD MATHIESON.

      8 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly ‎..

      O DATA RE-LINKS TO PI BY CERN MATHIESON - 3.14.

      8 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly ‎..

      ROSS LINKED PI TO CERN MATHIESON - 22/7 - 3.141.

      7 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly ‎..

      THE No BY ROSS' MIND, NOT A PARTICLE - 3.141592.

      7 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly Ana has a new name for Mr Parker, he does after all see himself as one -

      MATHIESON AND 'PARTICLE' LINKED TO BY ROSS.

      6 hours ago ·  ·  1 person

    • Ross Kelly ‎..

      BRIAN MATHIESON AND 22/7 IS R.KELLY'S O CODE.

      6 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly ‎..

      R.KELLY'S 22/7 No CODE AIDS BRIAN MATHIESON.

      6 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly ‎..

      KELLY'S PI No, BRIAN MATHIESON - 3DOT141592.

      6 hours ago · 

    • Ross Kelly And who's post are we on...oh yeah -

      PI LINK TO LYSTER AND MATHIESON - 3.1415926.

      5 hours ago ·  ·  1 person

    • Ross Kelly The mind behind the code is the mind behind the order of all things and all the humour there is belongs to her -

      A PI LINK TO BORE LYSTER AND MATHIESON - 3.14.

      5 hours ago ·  ·  1 person

    • Shirley Kobiela ‎.
      R.KELLY'S 22/7 No CODE AIDS BRIAN MATHIESON
      - here's hoping it does and also aids a few others !

      3 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker wow crazy fuck!!!
      3 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker what the hell do you think particles are??? It is a physical manifestation of electrons through the potentiality at the plank field...wow...I am NOT wrong..there IS room for a repeating pattern and any kind of "code" you are showing..which is just pseudo-science but whatever...simply reinforces that..you are quibbling...If there is an over all mind and he is revealing himself in set patterns then that of course would indicate the idea of a fractal holograph universe like I said...your insanity has taken away your reason...I prefer Occum's razor here as a logical analysis..it is much more likely you are seeing patterns where non exist as humans are conditioned to do so...I am not saying they don't exist I just don't think you know what you are doing personally....Like that character in beautiful Mind..he saw a great Universal Conspiracy and could mathematically draw out the patterns "proving" it..you have proven nothing but how mentally imbalanced you are..
      3 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker I do not believe you understand the Science you are trying to circumvent and redefine to meet some weird ideological perception of what "mind" as you put it is...the fact is you don't know what mind is anymore than the next human..AND There is nothing that points to a mind outside of particle reality but there are tons of evidence pointing to a "mind" or "over-all Consciousness" inside that reality. Furthermore, if we are all apart of GOD wouldn't that mean Particles are god?...you're just too off for me..
      3 hours ago · 

    • Shirley Kobiela ‎...ha ha ha ha ....bright spark....talking about planks..thick as one -

      '.the fact is you don't know what mind is anymore than the next human' -
      what a croc of s h i t e - just because YOU can't see that what you have just been shown is non random you assume that that is the case for everyone - yep, the 'particle' is very very wrong indeed and he has the cheek to call someone that does understand exactly what 'that' mind is a 'crazy fuck'- that's just f&*%ing crazy - so by your very statement you admit to not knowing 'that' mind - well here's an introduction to her - ♥
      https://www.facebook.com/g​roups/103820529673125?view​=doc&id=171811596207351



      In 1996 something extremely important (understatement of the century) happened that my partner Elaine and I were directly involved in. The other participants in it work for government intelligence ag...

      2 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker I do because I see insanity when it presents itself...The Ana Code..hahahhahahahahahahah​ahahahahahhahahaha... it isn't a croc of shit ...this is just more pattern referencing..a cliche..and has always been going on...you are just one more fool in a long line of foolish dogmatic ideas that people present "proof" for and ignore any evidence to the contrary..I've looked into this and it is fairly discredited by experts..so there's no point in arguing with a zealot like yourself though...you are a horse with blinders on who has found your Holy Grail and refuse to allow anyone to bring up rational reasonable contradictions to it....So it doesn't matter...again this has always been going on..a defect in the human mind...
      2 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker Just like the debunked bible code...Did you know researchers could pattern codes in a copy of Moby Dick?..ya whatever..enough randomness and patterns form...
      2 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker and you're an idiot to use "plank" within that analogy..it doesn't mean a wooden plank..it is named after the scientist who discovered the field...This is the problem..uneducated human beings tend to gravitate towards one or another conspiracy or ideology or something that explains everything for them, then they devout their whole identity and ego into this concept and an attack on it would mean the destruction of self or ego..i.e. Zealot.....
      2 hours ago · 

    • Shirley Kobiela 
      James I have to fire your own words back at you and say that it is YOU that is just one more fool in a long line of fools - you've looked into this...I'm quite certain you haven't -
      PRIORITY CODE - TELL MANKIND ANA'S THE BOSS
      SHOCK ALL NATIONS, BY - TIME IS PREORDAINED
      As for the bible code, well Ana sent them their proof too, but as you say the fools follow all the other fools with their dogmatic beliefs and CAN'T see the the proof in the evidence presented to them -
      https://www.facebook.com/n​ote.php?saved&&note_id=101​50323838845202 -

      THE BIBLE CODE KEY DROSNIN'S SOLUTION.   In Michael Drosnin's The Bible Code 2 ...See more

      2 hours ago · 

    • Shirley Kobiela like I said - thick as a plank
      2 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker 
      NO I"m sorry..I won't attack your fragile precious ego anymore..yes you are right..and those who find codes in Moby Dick or Spiderman comics are right too..yes..your ego will live on and is validated through your hogwash..don't worry there is no point in debunking your irrationality because you are irrational and cannot see the flaws in your own ideology. Again, there is nothing left I can say, an argument is pointless with the pointless..

      2 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker You have yet to use one bit of rational logical argument to defend or support your concept of this code..only links leading to a throughly debunked code that can be reproduced throughout literary works we are fairly sure weren't written down by some magical being..
      2 hours ago · 

    • James W. Parker ‎"priorty code-tell mankind Ana's the boss"..OMG..I don't even have to argue your crap..just publish more of your so-called code LOL..that'll be enough to defend my stance..hehe..
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker 
      AND yes I have read your little bible code and it's variation "Ana code" out of pure curiosity for the classic mental insanity that when the human mind goes haywire can spot pattern-association in anything..even things it doesn't belong...you are just mad human beings..what is the point...ugh..I don't even believe in the bible as a divine book why would I believe some pattern association bullshit that can be reproduced in almost every book long enough out there?

      about an hour ago · 

    • Ross Kelly No surprises here!
      about an hour ago · 

    • Shirley Kobiela 
      that's what I love about the human race, you point something out that they don't know and if they don't like it, they then tell you that you have an ego problem...hello, is there anybody in there, try reading ALL the evidence presented to you, I think you'll find this very educational - Codes & Ciphers -http://www.youtube.com/wat​ch?v=5Q8u3f-5DAU - or you certainly should anyway - my ego, that's a joke, when you are the one that has decided to believe what you have read by others who also know nothing about the code, because it affects THEIR egos by the very fact that they can't see it -
      YOUR words - 'If' there is an over all mind - 'IF'
      meaning you don't know, but you are quite prepared to cling to what you think you know, so who has the ego problem, certainly not me James, because I already know that God is real, the proof of the code is undeniable and if you think that by me knowing that makes me egotistical then you are very lost indeed. and all the works by all the Quantum physicists aint gonna help you unless they are telling you that God is indeed real and knowable.

      about an hour ago · 

    • Ross Kelly Particle's the genuine article, she must be referring to the size of his brain. Thick as shit and full of it too.
      about an hour ago ·  ·  1 person

    • James W. Parker 
      I am not prepared to cling to what I "think" I know..we have rediscovered and are rediscovering things constantly...unlike what you think I have read and seen documents on these codes and have come to an over all opinion with the contradictory evidence that it is a false illusion of your own preceived pattern association..you see them where there really aren't any. So I digress there we are..you can have your strange beliefs I rationally analyzed it and dismissed it..

      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker AND when I say ego..it means someone who is a zealot and can't handle contradictory evidence..I am not supporting one belief or another you are..I am contradicting your belief and saying that it doesn't hold water under scrutiny..you can't accept that possibility..
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker GO FUCK YOURSELF KELLY..COME ON YOU LITTLE BITCH YOU WANT TO GET INTO SOME KIND OF NAME CALLING WAR BECAUSE YOU CAN'T DEFEND YOUR STUPID CULT IDEA ANYMORE?..I say you're just a nutty who belongs i bellvue.. how is any of that accomplishing anything..whatever
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker The proof of the code is not undeniable because very rational people can deny it and bring up counter points to it so yes your assumption is based on ego with statements like that
      about an hour ago · 

    • Shirley Kobiela tut tut tut, sounding a bit disgruntled there James - bad day at the office?
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker Maybe you do know of god's existence maybe you don't...I am arguing the idea of a debunked biblical code..
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker NO I am responding to bitch Kelly's personal attack and name calling so fuck him..
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker AND if you read my statement i was making a point..how he was reducing himself to nothing more than name calling because there is nothing left for him
      about an hour ago · 

    • Shirley Kobiela yeah Ross,. how could you call him a particle
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker AND after I called you both insane..
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker what kind of hiccups do you two zealots have with particles? We can measure and see them..I guess that isn't enough proof though..everything is made up of atoms which are technically particles???..I don't understand your argument against it..except to deny what is measurable and that is a fallacy of reason I cannot argue with
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker Why can I reproduce your code in almost every long novel out there? Something that has been done over and over again..
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker Why is it that your code only reveals things that have come to pass and not one reference to something before it happens that is published and turns out to be correct?
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker How is it that Mathmetitians discovered the variable chaos indicator which shows that enough strung words or numbers together will create almost any and all possible patterns?..
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker Mathematicians
      about an hour ago · 

    • Shirley Kobiela 
      only an insane person could call us insane as that is how negativity works - 34 letters James, all anagrams of each other - THINK about it, Ross has had the completed key since 2002, yet in 2011 it can say -
      PI LINK TO LYSTER AND MATHIESON - 3.1415926 -
      that would mean that Ross would have to have set up the life of both those people and PI and have it timed to coincide with this link of FB which would mean he would also have to be responsible for that and Karen and Brian being members on FB - and you probably think of yourself as an educated person :( - sad.
      Open your eyes man, you've got blinkers on - you can take a horse to water....

      about an hour ago · 

    • Ross Kelly Ooooh!
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker Hahahaha...oh my god..how ridiculous!!!...again you can find patterns in anything..you don't have to set it up..they ran an experiment and found an exacting pattern they were asked to look for in a random novel..moby dick.it is interesting he discovered this AFTER he had current info..already within our talks here
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker it's blinders not blinkers...lmao
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker but if the horse has skizophrenia he will drink the dirt
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker You probably think of yourself as a sane woman...sad..
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker ok predict something within the next 48 hours that references anything close to my life? Can you? Tell me something revealed to the code that you would have no other way of knowing about my life? Give me some empirical evidence to go on...the problem is you can't but if you can I am listening...
      about an hour ago · 

    • Shirley Kobiela Ok mate, I predict that you are going to be more insane in the next 48 hours - if that's possible
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker 
      and no not only an insane person can call you insane..but someone who believes you are being irrational in your belief and thought processes could also assume you are insane...I would agree an unkind person would call you insane which I admit to being harsh on this link..I don't tolerate irrational thought well..I'm leaving for awhile but if you can give me something..anything that would be impossible to know without the code that I could measurably see reveal itself to me you have a believer

      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker See just another nutty attack..can't do it can you..my point proven..I have opened my mind a little but given you a bar that you cannot achieve but if you were correct about your code it should be a bar you should be able to achieve
      about an hour ago · 

    • Ross Kelly Duh, the reason it was found in Moby Dick is because the Bible and Moby Dick came from the same mind ...you thick moron.
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker WOW..
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker So all writing comes from the same mind and therefore all writing has gods hidden code in it..that is a nice out...the statement proves nothing
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker later..you guys can say what you want but anyone reading this will see that I very plainly laid down an offer to you and a challenge to show your code to be real..no closed mind here.. but set with conditions that would negate rational doubt..so I am waiting for that or we're done..have the last insane little word and attack..
      about an hour ago · 

    • Ross Kelly You are behaving like a very worried man. Quite rightly too, you should be.
      about an hour ago · 

    • James W. Parker ‎? why am I behaving like a worried man? because I laid down a challenge to show me proof of your code? Isn't that what you wanted..to be open to its possibility...oh never mind..say what you want ugh..answer my challenge or you don't have the goods to back up your claim..that simple
      about an hour ago · 

    • Shirley Kobiela there's none so blind as those who will not see -

      BOLD CODE LINES TO TIP THINKERS - ARSMAGNA -

      https://www.facebook.com/n​ote.php?note_id=1015031826​5075202


      ARS MAGNA     Before I continue demonstrating the great art I will show you so...See more

      41 minutes ago · 

    • James W. Parker hahahaha...again same old..no answer to a perfectly reasonable challenge especially with what you are claiming..
      39 minutes ago · 

    • Shirley Kobiela Like the code line states James, it's for thinkers, so you need not apply.
      38 minutes ago · 

    • James W. Parker again a simplistic attack from a simplistic dogma
      38 minutes ago · 

    • Ross Kelly 
      I already showed you the proof of the code you stupid man.
      Do you know the really funny thing, the people who 'picked' Moby Dick had no choice but to pick that book, the joke's on them and you with them.


      ELI RIPS, DROSNIN, ANA TALKS TO THEM BY CODE.

      (Anagram of)

      CODE, BRIAN MATHIESON, AND R.KELLY POSTS IT.

      and every other code line I posted on this stream.

      It's not my fault that you are in a blind panic.

      37 minutes ago · 

    • Shirley Kobiela it's not an attack James, it's a point of fact, you're not a thinker
      37 minutes ago · 

    • James W. Parker Well forgive me if I don't take your opinion too highly in this regard
      36 minutes ago · 

    • James W. Parker Every one of those so-called proofs you listed after the fact...anyone can see
      35 minutes ago · 

    • James W. Parker ok there is nothing else to say here..I think you are wrong..you believe in your ideology without fault and there we are...I could no more talk to you than a fundamentalist Christian who believes all the stories in the bible...
      34 minutes ago · 

    • James W. Parker and for the record I'm not panicking I'm laughing..
      33 minutes ago · 

    • Ross Kelly You may recall that well before you brought up the subject of Moby Dick I posted the single word 'The'

      ANA PLANNED ROSS' THE...IT'S TO RILE MOBY DICK.

      Now, she's given you another label, the one YOU brought up...dick head.

      24 minutes ago · 

    • James W. Parker GO FUCK YOURSELF PRICK.YOU WANT TO REDUCE THIS TO NAME CALLING...YOU LITTLE CHILD MOLESTER..I LOOKED YOU UP AND FOR THE RECORD THAT WAS SICK..THAT GIRL WAS 9 YEARS OLD AND I REFUSE TO TALK TO SOMEONE LIKE YOU
      21 minutes ago · 

    • Ross Kelly What on earth are you talking about now? What girl was 9 years old?
      Please show us what you saw because there are lots of people like you out there who try very hard to discredit me and you must have found one of them Show us all the link. Show the whole world the link, you can post it on my profile you siick fucker.

      17 minutes ago · 

    • Ross Kelly If you check the record you are the one who started the name calling.
      15 minutes ago · 

    • Ross Kelly ‎"wow crazy fuck!!!"

      "GO FUCK YOURSELF KELLY..COME ON YOU LITTLE BITCH YOU WANT TO GET INTO SOME KIND OF NAME CALLING WAR BECAUSE YOU CAN'T DEFEND YOUR STUPID CULT "

      11 minutes ago · 

    • Ross Kelly A moment ago you said you were laughing, what? laughing at a child molester? You need help mate.

      There are three classes of people: those who see, those who see when they are shown, those who do not see. ~ Leonardo da Vinci


      GUESS which one you belong to.


      Still waiting.....




      ANA PLANNED ROSS' THE...IT'S TO RILE MOBY DICK.


      Response -


      GO FUCK YOURSELF PRICK.YOU WANT TO REDUCE THIS TO NAME CALLING...YOU LITTLE CHILD MOLESTER..I LOOKED YOU UP AND FOR THE RECORD THAT WAS SICK..THAT GIRL WAS 9 YEARS OLD AND I REFUSE TO TALK TO SOMEONE LIKE YOU


      That worked then, but of course it did, Ana planned it.

No comments:

Post a Comment